Financials · Platform Roll-Up Model
NASA Platform
Roll-Up Financials

Platform-level financial model for the $40M NASA Hospitals roll-up. 5-year path to 1,000 beds via ~2 acquisitions per year, integrated with NASA's five-lever playbook. Platform revenue, EBITDA build, return scenarios (Base / Upside / Downside), and IPO exit math.

View: Platform-Level Pro-Forma
Raise: $40M
Horizon: 5-year build · Exit FY29–FY30
Platform Targets
Platform Raise$40M
FY30 Beds1,000
FY30 Revenue₹350 Cr
FY30 EBITDA₹80 Cr
Base MOIC2.9x
Base IRR27%
Upside MOIC / IRR3.8x / 33%
Exit Multiple16–18x EBITDA
01
Platform Roll-Up
5-Year Path to 1,000 Beds
YearBedsAcquisitionsRevenue (₹ Cr)EBITDA (₹ Cr)Margin
FY26150 (Remedy) + 300 (NASA existing)Remedy close85~1821%
FY27+80 (1 acq) = 530 beds1 acquisition130~2519%
FY28+150 (2 acq) = 680 beds2 acquisitions185~3821%
FY29+160 (2 acq) = 840 beds2 acquisitions265~5822%
FY30 (Exit)1,000 beds1 final acq3508023%

Platform-level revenue is consolidated across all hospitals in the portfolio. EBITDA margin dips during acquisition/integration years and recovers as hospitals mature into NASA's playbook.

02
Return Scenarios
Base · Upside · Downside
ScenarioFY29 EBITDA (₹ Cr)Exit MultipleExit EV (₹ Cr)Equity Value (₹ Cr)MOICIRR
Downside2014x2801202.2x21%
Base2416x3841602.9x27%
Upside2718x4862103.8x33%
03
Strategic Rationale
Why the Platform Works

1. Fragmented market, few institutional buyers. India has 10,000+ independent 50–150-bed secondary-care hospitals, many under distress. Corporate chains (Apollo, Max) focus on 300+ bed tertiary multi-specialty — leaving the mid-market specialty segment structurally under-professionalised and available at deep discount.

2. Arbitrage between entry and exit multiples. Distressed secondary-care trades at 8–10x EBITDA; stabilised specialty platforms trade at 15–18x. The consolidation arbitrage alone produces ~2× value creation before any organic EBITDA growth.

3. Asset-light posture. Leasing real estate rather than owning it preserves capital for operations and M&A, supporting the 25–30% ROCE target vs 15–18% for traditional hospital operators.

4. Clear exit pathway. Dual-path exit — IPO (Medanta precedent: ₹500 Cr pre-IPO at 16x) or strategic sale to Apollo / Max / Fortis / Manipal — provides optionality on the exit market and timing.

04
Key Assumptions
Platform Model Inputs
Acquisition Pace~2 hospitals / year (staggered)
Acquisition Entry Multiple8–10x EBITDA (distressed)
Post-Turnaround EBITDA Margin24–25%
Integration Period12–18 months per hospital
Real Estate ModelLease-based (asset-light)
Target Occupancy at Stabilisation75%
Target ROCE25–30%
Exit Multiple (base)16x EBITDA
Exit Multiple (upside)18x EBITDA
Exit Path (primary)IPO at FY29–FY30
Exit Path (secondary)Strategic sale to Apollo / Max / Fortis / Manipal

Platform business plan

Full strategy, operating playbook, specialty verticals, M&A roadmap, leadership model, and IPO exit path on the Platform Business Plan page.

Disclaimer · Confidential Financial Model
Projected Financials · Forward-Looking
All financial figures are projected and forward-looking, based on management assumptions regarding integration execution, clinical ramp, ARPOB trajectory, and exit market conditions. Actual results may differ materially. Investment involves risk of loss of principal.

NASA Hospitals India